Types of Research
Survey Research
-
Survey Research: Non-experimental method to collect data via questions.
-
Steps:
-
Define problem.
-
Select population/sample.
-
Choose data tools.
-
Collect & analyze data.
-
-
Tools: Questionnaires, interviews, checklists.
-
Types:
-
Descriptive
-
Analytical
-
Cross-sectional
-
Longitudinal
-
-
Questions:
-
Structured: fixed answers.
-
Unstructured: open-ended.
-
-
Precautions: Avoid bias, ensure clarity, logical order.
-
Advantages: Cost-effective, wide reach, data-rich.
-
Disadvantages: Response bias, limited depth.
-
Issues: Sampling errors, misinterpretation, non-response.
Ex-Post Facto Research
-
Ex-Post Facto Research: Study of causes after effects have occurred.
-
Purpose: Find reasons for past outcomes (e.g., recession causes).
-
Design Types:
-
Exploratory
-
Descriptive
-
Analytical
-
-
Characteristics:
-
Non-manipulative
-
Based on observation
-
Uses existing data
-
-
Vs. Experimental:
-
No control over variables.
-
No random assignment.
-
-
Causality Conditions:
-
Cause precedes effect.
-
Strong correlation.
-
No alternative explanations.
-
-
Steps:
-
Identify problem.
-
Formulate hypothesis.
-
Select method & tools.
-
Analyze data.
-
-
Strengths: Ethical, practical, cost-effective.
-
Weaknesses: Limited control, risk of bias.
-
Post Hoc Fallacy: Mistaking correlation for causation.
Experimental Research (Field Experiment)
-
Experimental Research: Manipulate IV, observe effect on DV.
-
Field Experiments: Conducted in real-life settings.
-
Goal: Establish cause-effect relationship.
Types of Experimental Research
-
Single Case: Focus on one subject; used in clinical/behavioral studies.
-
Quasi-Experimental: No full control over variables; real-life settings.
-
Pure Experimental: Complete control; lab-based; uses randomization.
Field vs Lab Experiments
Field Experiment | Lab (Experimental) Research |
---|---|
Natural setting, less control | Controlled lab environment |
Variables less controlled | Variables tightly controlled |
Two matched groups | One group with manipulated variables |
Results realistic but less precise | Results precise, less generalizable |
Mixed qualitative & quantitative | Always quantitative |
Strengths of Field Experiments
-
Real-life relevance
-
Useful in social sciences
-
Flexible & broadly applicable
-
Good for hypothesis testing
Weaknesses
-
Extraneous variables present
-
Requires consent/cooperation
-
Less precision than lab studies
-
Difficult control over error variance
Building the Field Experiment
-
Planning: Define setting, tools, measurement
-
Sampling: Probability (random, stratified) or non-probability
-
Research Design: Blueprint for study
-
Data Tools: Tests, questionnaires, etc.
-
Procedure: Pre/post-tests with control & experimental groups
-
Statistical Analysis: t-test, ANOVA
Research Design Goals
-
Answer research questions
-
Control and explain variance
Good Design Criteria
-
Answers research questions clearly
-
Controls extraneous variables
-
Ensures internal/external validity
-
Can be generalized and replicated
Advanced Designs
-
Classical Pretest-Posttest
-
Solomon Four-Group Design
-
Factorial Design
-
Between/Within/Mixed Designs